HRMIS General Values ​​- Scores & Evaluation Methods

HRMIS Shared Scores – Scores & Assessment Methods is an important component of the MyPerformance system through ( which is used to assess the behavior and professionalism of civil servants through a 360 degree evaluation method.

Through 15 assessment items and a specific score scale, the Punyya Value helps provide a comprehensive picture of the performance of an Assessed Officer (PYD).

Introduction to HRMIS Shared Values

Common Value is a form of 360 degree assessment. The maximum score that can be achieved by each assessor is 55 marks, while the minimum score is 11 marks.

The total raw score obtained by P3P will be converted into a score of 1-10. For the purposes of PYD intervention or development programs, the final score obtained based on the P3P assessment results will be displayed and compared with the final self-assessment score.

HRMIS Shared Values ​​Procedure

Step 1 – PYD carries out self-evaluation until the ranking is complete.

Step 2 – PYD carries out assessments as P3P to the officers assigned to him until completion.

Step 3 – Status completed assessment*.

*The evaluation submitted is final and cannot be changed.

Process Flow Chart

HRMIS Shared Values
HRMIS Shared ValuesHRMIS Shared Values

Items and Rating Scales

Common Value includes fifteen (15) evaluation items that evaluate the behavior of an Officer Under Evaluation (PYD). Each item is evaluated using a Likert scale with five (5) answer choices representing a score of 1 to 5.

Rating Scale:

  • Never (Never) – 1
  • Rarely (Rarely) – 2
  • Sometimes (Sometimes / Seldom) – 3
  • Frequently (Very Frequently) – 4
  • Very Often (Always) – 6

Evaluation Items:

  1. Provide equal treatment to all parties
  2. Be willing to admit mistakes and errors
  3. Able to collaborate with other individuals so that task/organization goals are achieved
  4. Convey or share information related to current tasks within the team/organization
  5. Willing to receive advice, views and suggestions
  6. Respect others
  7. Understand the feelings and needs of others
  8. Use work time wisely to complete tasks
  9. Didn’t choose work
  10. Able to control emotions when facing difficult and difficult situations
  11. Implement the work code of ethics established by the department in the assignment
  12. Do not come to work without permission
  13. Creating sexual harassment in the workplace
  14. Abusing his position as a civil servant
  15. Behavior that can damage the image of public services
HRMIS Shared ValuesHRMIS Shared Values

Achievement Category

Score Category Implications
95 – 100% Significantly Exceeded Target (ST) – Pass one of the initial selections for the Competency and Potential Assessment

– Certified annual salary movements

85 – <95% Exceeding Target Exceed Target (ET) – Pass one of the initial selections for the Competency and Potential Assessment

– Certified annual salary movement

75 – <85% Achieving Target On Target (OT) – Pass one of the initial Competency and Potential Assessment screenings with a performance score of 80% or above

– Certified annual salary movements

<75% Did Not Meet Target (BT) – Given a period of 6 (six) months for special performance evaluation before termination of special services before termination of services for performance value less than 70%

– Certified not to be given annual salary movements

The total raw score obtained through P3P will be converted into a score between 1 and 10. For the purposes of PYD intervention or development programs, the final score of the P3P assessment will be displayed and compared with the final score of the self-assessment.

Tutorial on how to fill in general values

Here’s a complete tutorial on how to fill in general values ​​in HRMIS:

1. How to Maintain a General Grade Table – Special Session

HRMIS Shared ValuesHRMIS Shared Values
HRMIS Shared ValuesHRMIS Shared Values
HRMIS Shared ValuesHRMIS Shared Values

2. Maintain P3P

3. P3P evaluation

4. Check Evaluation Status

When the Score is Low, What Should You Do?

If today you feel too tired, frustrated, or sad after seeing your General Value score:

  1. Pause. Exit HRMIS.
  2. Inhale slowly.
  3. Drink water or take a short walk away from the screen.
  4. If there’s someone you trust, talk.
  5. If you can’t talk, just write on the phone — it’s enough to lighten the load on your chest.

The most important:
Don’t hold back until your own heart burns slowly just because of one score.

Similarity values ​​can be discussed again. The results can be reviewed. The system can be fought to be fairer. It’s a long term job.

But while waiting for the system to change, one thing you need to take care of is your mental health and self-esteem.

Scores may fluctuate annually. However, your value as a human being, as a civil servant who serves society is much greater and is never determined by a single number in the system.

Frequently Asked Questions – General HRMIS Values

1. I have completed the evaluation of all actions in the Evaluation Dashboard → General Values ​​but the status in the PYD Dashboard still shows ‘Under Evaluation’.

The evaluation status displayed on the PYD Dashboard is ‘Under Evaluation’, which indicates that there are still P3Ps who have not completed the PYD evaluation.

2. Can evaluation be carried out after the evaluation period ends?

Can’t. The PPSM Secretariat needs to update the assessment deadline on the Admin Dashboard → Maintaining a Shared Value Assessment Schedule to extend the assessment period.

3. What is meant by Self Score and Feedback Score?

Self Score is the final score of self-assessment carried out by PYD while Feedback Score is the average score assessed by P3P against PYD.

4. Why does the General Score status for the PYD under my supervision on the Assessment Dashboard → List of Assessed Officers not show the Independent Score even though the PYD has completed the self-assessment?

The PYD Similarity Value is not displayed because PP has not carried out an independent assessment.

5. Can the PYD hold two annual sessions in the same performance year?

Yes, if PYD is given the role of P3P in another agency. Officers must evaluate all actions listed according to the evaluation session in the same performance year.

6. What should officers do if they do not recognize the PYD that has been determined to be assessed?

Officers can notify administrators in their respective agencies regarding P3P changes in the P3P Maintenance Menu.

7. There are officers who cannot evaluate superiors/officers/officers of the same level
subordinate. This has caused dissatisfaction among some staff in the department who consider this system ‘UNFAIR’ because they do not have a role to do this.
carry out evaluations of superior officials/equivalent officials/subordinate employees.

1) The system automatically assigns a minimum of three P3P people who are high-ranking, equal or low-ranking officials who have a working relationship with PYD and come from the same organizational unit. Determination of P3P by the system depends on the agency’s organizational structure which is regulated in the Personnel Data Module.

2) If the agency decides to assign more P3P than the number determined by the system, the manager can add officers to the Maintenance function

8. In the General Value Monitoring Status function, why doesn’t the officer display PRS3?

1) The officer does not have PRS3 because the P3P designated as PRS3 by the system has been disconnected in HRMIS.

2) In addition to the General Value Assessment Status Monitoring function, administrators can check and update the P3P PYD list in the P3P Maintenance Monitoring function.

9. Why can’t I add P3P because the add button is not active?

The Add button is not active because the PYD evaluation status is Under Evaluation, which means one of the P3Ps is being evaluated/finished. Administrators can check the PYD evaluation status in Admin Dashboard → General Grade Monitoring → General Grade Evaluation Status.

10. Request an explanation of the self-score and feedback score methods to understand the scores received and their relationship to performance problems

As a control mechanism, the scoring method for joint value assessment is not published. Common Value is one of the performance elements evaluated in MyPerformance that contributes to the evaluation of performance issues.

Also read:

News
Berita Teknologi
Berita Olahraga
Sports news
sports
Motivation
football prediction
technology
Berita Technologi
Berita Terkini
Tempat Wisata
News Flash
Football
Gaming
Game News
Gamers
Jasa Artikel
Jasa Backlink
Agen234
Agen234
Agen234
Resep
Download Film

Gaming center adalah sebuah tempat atau fasilitas yang menyediakan berbagai perangkat dan layanan untuk bermain video game, baik di PC, konsol, maupun mesin arcade. Gaming center ini bisa dikunjungi oleh siapa saja yang ingin bermain game secara individu atau bersama teman-teman. Beberapa gaming center juga sering digunakan sebagai lokasi turnamen game atau esports.